Facts about credit card lawsuits
-Have you been sued (or threatened with suit) for an old credit card debt?
-Have you been sued by someone other than the original creditor?
-Sued by some company with an odd sounding name like AIS Services, CACH, Credigy, Commonwealth, Dodeka or Unifund?
-Is the debt past the statute of limitations?
-Did you already pay off or settle the debt and still they are suing you?
-Are they harassing you?
I have helped a lot of people with these cases. The usual outcome is that I get the case dismissed. Sometimes I can even recover your attorney's fees and damages.
Part One: About me
Civil litigation is a major part of my law practice. My clients tend to be small businesses, but I also represent individuals. I have been an attorney since 1995. I have successfully defended people against many credit card cases.
www.creditdefenselaw.com
Part Two: The Statute of Limitations Defense
There are time limits on filing a lawsuit. These are called "statute of limitations." Under Texas law, the statute of limitations on credit card debt is four years from when you breached your contractual obligation to pay the credit card bill. If more than four years have passed since your credit card became past due and you have not made a payment since then, the statute of limitations has probably run. If the credit card company did not file the lawsuit until after these four years, then you should be able to get the case dismissed.
Unfortunately, there are things you can do to reset the statute of limitations clock, like making a payment or signing an agreement with the credit card company.
The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense. This means you have to raise the defense in your answer to the lawsuit. You also have the burden of proof on this defense. This is something you should be able to prove by looking through your bank records and credit card records. At the very least, you need to be willing to testify under oath that the default was more than four years ago.
Part Three: Other Defenses: Standing To Bring the Lawsuit
Often times, the companies who purchased these debts from the credit card companies don't have sufficient records to prove that they actually own the debt. They try to fake it, but their so called "business records" often are inadmissible if you know how to challenge them. If they can't prove they own the debt, I can get the case dismissed.
Part Four: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
If a debt collector sues you (or even threatens to sue you) for a debt that it knew (or should have known) was past the statute of limitations, that is a violation of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). If you can prove they violated the FDCPA, you can sue them for actual damages, statutory damages of $1,000, and attorney's fees.
Other violations of the FDCPA include making threats to put a lien on your homestead, threats to have you arrested, misrepresenting themselves as law enforcement or a government agency, calling you at odd hours, refusing to verify the debt, and so on. There is a whole list of bad behavior that violates the FDCPA. If you hire me, I will go through the facts of your case with you to see if you have a FDCPA claim.
Filing a countersuit for violation of the FDCPA can be a very effective strategy, and it is the main method by which you can recover attorney's fees and damages in these cases.
Part Five: Settlement
Sometimes, the plaintiffs do manage to prove the debt, there is no statute of limitations defense, and the violations of the FDCPA, if any, add up to less than what you are being sued for. In those cases, it is not likely that the case will get dismissed, but I can try to negotiate a favorable settlement.
Part Six: Contacting Me
You are probably wondering what it will cost to hire me. After you and I have discussed your case, I will be glad to explain my fees to you. I won't charge you anything to call or email me to discuss whether or not I am willing to take your case. I won't charge you anything to discuss my fee arrangements. The first call is free.
If you are thinking of hiring me, don't delay. The deadline to answer a lawsuit is pretty short, and it is really short in the small claims and justice of the peace courts.
Part Seven: Information I Need
If you email me or call me, please have the following information ready:
-your name, address and telephone number;
-the geographic location of the court and the name of the court;
-the date on which you were served with the lawsuit;
-the last date on which you paid the credit card;
-the date the lawsuit was filed (look up in the top right corner of the first page of the petition for a date stamp);
-the amount you are being sued for;
-the name of the lawfirm or lawyer who is suing you; and
-the name of the plaintiff who is suing you.
Part Eight: Past Outcomes
Past outcomes or results are no guarantee or prediction of your results. Each case is unique and the outcome depends on the facts and other factors.
Having said that, people nevertheless want to know what kind of results I have obtained in these cases.
The most common result is that I get the case dismissed without my client paying any money to the debt collector. While my clients do have to pay my legal fee, my legal fee have always been far less than what they were being sued for and less than what the debt collector would have been willing to settle for.
In some cases, I also am able to recover damages and attorney's fees. To get damages and attorney's fees takes a stronger case than those that just result in a dismissal. We have to be able to prove that the debt collector knowingly violated the FDCPA or otherwise acted carelesssly or in bad faith. If I recover a sufficient amount of attorney's fees on the counterclaim, then my representation ends up being free for my client, and any damages collected are paid directly to my clients.
please visit my other website devoted exclusively to credit card lawsuits: www.creditdefenselaw.com
If you wish to contact me about your case, please send me an email. Please do not submit a comment to this blog for that purpose. You can email me at info@simmonspc.com










Comments
Unifund is actually Unifund CCR Partners, a trademark registered in Ohio. The trademark is owned by Unifund CCR Partners, a general partnership registered in Delaware. The general partnership here is between Credit Card Receivables Fund, Inc. registered in Ohio, and ZB Limited Partners, a general partnership registered in Delaware. I am still working on just exactly who are the ZB partners, but it looks like they have no corporate protection. Maybe they do not need any because ZB is short for Zurich (Swiss) Bank! David G. Rosenberg, you bad boy. You or your ZB buddies haven't flown out of Lunken Field on a private jet to an offshore destination with more than $10,000 in cash and bonds on board, have you? A certain Federal Prosecutor wants to know.
Posted by: B A Nobody | February 15, 2009 9:26 AM
Thank you for sharing this information.
Posted by: Can A Credit Card Company Sue You | February 21, 2009 4:42 AM
I doubt they care about corporate protection because their exposure under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is not that significant. Statutory damages are limited to $1,000 per case. Cases in which the consumer can prove significant actual damages are rare. They've probably found that the cost of paying franchise tax as a limited liability company or corporation outweighes the legal protection they are afforded by being a corporate entity. If you are not worried about personal liability, then being a general partnership can have its advantages. Third party debt collectors do occassionally get tagged for violating the FDCPA, but it is just a cost of doing business and is already factored into their business model. They get tagged, they pay, and move on to the next case. As for a connection to Zurich Bank, you're kidding, right? I don't think there's any conspiracy between these debt collectors and the big banks. There's no need for a conspiracy. It's just a way for some investors to make some money. The rest of your post, concerning what a federal prosecutor wants to know, I must assume is satire.
Posted by: Anderson M. Simmons
|
February 23, 2009 11:43 AM
The transfer of Unifund proceeds from:Unifund CCR Partners,ZB Limited Partnership,ZB Linited Partners,ZB/CCR, Inc. andCredit Card Receivables Fund, Inc toAssociated Capital LP,A Cap, Inc., andAssociated Capital Offshore/L/P is managed at the offices of the Zises Brothers Jay & Selig at:767 3rd Ave Fl 16
New York, New York USA 10017-9017http://www.superpages.com/bp/New-York-NY/ACAP-Inc-L2065062531.htm. This Schedule 13G is being filed jointly by
Associated Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership ("Associated"), its general partner, A
Cap, Inc., a New York Corporation ("A Cap"), Jay H.
Zises, the President and a director of A Cap, Selig
A. Zises, Vice President, Treasurer and a director of
A Cap, Nancy J. Frankel-Zises, a director, Vice
President and Secretary and the sole stockholder of A
Cap, and Associated Capital Offshore, L.P., a Cayman
Islands limited partnership ("Associated Offshore").
Associated, A Cap, Jay H. Zises, Selig A. Zises,
Nancy J. Frankel-Zises and Associated Offshore are
hereinafter sometime referred to collectively as the
"Reporting Persons". The business address of
Associated Offshore is c/o Goldman Sachs (Cayman)
Trust, Limited, P.O. Box 896, George Town, Grand
Cayman, Cayman Islands, British West Indies. The
business address of each other Reporting Person is
477 Madison Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, New York,
10022. Jay H. Zises, Selig A. Zises and Nancy J.
Frankel-Zises are each United States citizens.
Posted by: daah | March 8, 2009 10:05 AM
Now government had passed the new rule that nobody will go the customer's working place or home. Every day these debt collectors making calls to the customers and also delivers letter to them at their working place it's not right so govt had passed this rule. Even our debit collection lawyer are also their for your help.
Posted by: Debit Collection Lawyer | July 1, 2009 2:57 AM